For the past month I've been compiling the impact analaysis data for PACAP (wwww.pacap.org.ph). It has proven to be an interesting and challenging assigment to assimilate data from a diverse protfolio of projects, and to make 'sense' of the impact of the program. It has occured to me that the concept of 'impact' can be interpretted in terms of three dimesions: * Magnitude: the scale of the changes effected. *Timeframe: the amount of time that an intervention may take to realise the intended changes. * Breadth: the extent to which benefits are experienced by a narrow or broad base of beneficiaries.
Currently rated 4.0 by 4 people
-
Posted by Phillip kakande on Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Great,the 3 levels of interpretation are quite elaborate. I also wonder whether we could add attribution as another level. To which extent can a project claim impact for causing change?
Phillip kakande
-
Posted by Simon Payne on Thursday, May 27, 2010
It reminds me a bit of the RE-AIM model used extensively in health evaluations. Perhaps substitute 'Reach' for 'Breadth' since that term seems to be more widely used term encompassing the same idea.
Simon Payne
Loading, please waiting...